Grading sample Papers

On the Foreign Athletics Paper this person would recieve a B about an 84. I picked this grade because for Clarity and Purpose there is no set thesies it is once you read the paragraphs you understand what the author is talking about. Quality of Thought was ok I felt like there were times where he would repeat some of the thoughts over and over thought the whole paper. Organization of Content was pretty good. He used his sources well, every quote had proper reference and documentation. The author language and stlye was ok not much strong vocabulary and diction. As for Grammar and Mechanics and was pretty good.

On the Online College vs. Online High School this person would recieve a D about a 65. I picked this grade because there was no real thesis I could pinpoint. Quality of Thought some of his points was kind of unclear. In Organization this author was all over the place. They used some but not much. Language and style was not good there were mistakes throughout the whole paper.

On the Predisposed to Divorce this person would recieve a B+ almost a 93. I gave them this grade because the thesis was apparant. There Quality of Thought was good they supported each though with a clear support. Organization was done well they made a great developing argument. When the author quote a sorce the proper documentaion was used. Language and style was used well it supported the purpose well. This paper had slight grammartical mistakes.

On the NAACP Case Against Gun Manufactures this person would get a B about an 85. I would give them this because the Clarity of purpose isn't really apparant I think th e intro could have been better. As for Quality of Thought was pretty good the claims was all supported with reason. Organization was good a well on point was followed by another in a way that was easy to understand and had a good flow. Use of sources was used well when the author quoted a soucre they used the proper doumentaion. Language and style wasn't complex but it allowed me to follow along and it supported the purpose. Grammar and Stlye was good not any major grammar errors none that would take away from the reading in any way.